Skip to content

The Transition neither opposes, suppresses, nor promotes any religion. Religion, in its many forms, expresses something deep and enduring in human nature. It is a personal matter and a personal right, to be respected without exception — as long as it is not used to coerce, oppress, or harm others.

Religion is part of who we are

Throughout human history, across every continent and culture, people have sought meaning, connection, and transcendence through religious and spiritual practice. This impulse appears to be woven into our nature as deeply as language, humor, music, and love. It enriches lives, strengthens communities, and has inspired countless acts of compassion and courage.

Any framework for human society that ignores, dismisses, or suppresses this dimension of human experience is incomplete and ultimately doomed to fail — because it is working against a fundamental part of what makes us human.

This is not communism

Because the Transition proposes an alternative to capitalism, some people may assume it resembles communism. It does not — and the treatment of religion is one of the clearest differences.

Karl Marx observed that religion was being used by corrupt power structures to keep people submissive, and from that observation concluded that religion itself was the problem. Soviet and related regimes tried to eliminate religion by criminalizing it. They failed. When the Soviet Union dissolved, religion resurfaced almost immediately, because it could not be erased — it runs too deep.

The Transition draws a different conclusion from the same observation: when religion is twisted to serve power, the problem is the power structure, not the religion. Remove the coercive power structure, and religion is freed to be what it is at its best — a source of meaning, community, compassion, and personal growth.

Suppression does not produce genuine compliance. It produces fear, guilt, and covert resistance. The Transition rejects suppression as a tool — of religion, of thought, of expression — because it is both ineffective and incompatible with a society of free, empowered people.

Freedom of religion and separation of church and state

Two principles are essential for any society where people are genuinely free:

  1. Freedom of religion — every person has the right to follow their own path of belief, practice, and spiritual exploration, including the right to hold no religious belief at all.
  2. Separation of church and state — no religion may use the mechanisms of governance to impose its beliefs on others, and no government may interfere with the free practice of religion.

These are not in tension with each other. They are two sides of the same protection. Together, they ensure that your faith is yours — not something imposed on you by an employer, a landlord, a government, or anyone with power over your livelihood.

The line: personal practice versus coercion

The Transition holds a clear and simple boundary:

You are free to practice your religion. You are not free to impose it on others.

  • If your religion requires a certain diet, you are free to eat accordingly — but not to prevent others from eating as they choose.
  • If your religion prescribes a dress code, you are free to dress that way — but not to dictate how others dress.
  • If your religion holds certain relationships to be wrong, you are free to live according to that belief — but not to deny goods, services, housing, or respect to people whose lives differ from your convictions.
  • If you wish to leave a religious community, your right to do so will be protected.

This applies equally to every religion, every belief system, and every person — without exception.

Why the Transition changes the conditions

Much of the harm done in the name of religion throughout history has been entangled with economic and political power. When those who control resources can use religious justifications to discriminate, exclude, or coerce, religion becomes a weapon of the powerful against the vulnerable.

In a post-Transition society, this dynamic is structurally impossible:

  • No one controls another's access to the means of life. Your housing, food, healthcare, and livelihood do not depend on the approval of an employer or landlord.
  • Without economic leverage over others, the most common mechanism for religious coercion disappears.
  • Governance is transparent, consensus-driven, and accountable to the community. There are no lobbyists, no financial inducements, no channels for special interests to capture the political process.
  • Education includes critical thinking, self-awareness, and the ability to recognize manipulation — making people far more resistant to exploitative religious movements.

The result is not a society without religion. It is a society where religion can be what it is for the vast majority of believers: a positive, life-affirming force that enriches their lives and inspires them to treat others with compassion.

Difficult questions, honest answers

The Transition does not pretend that every religious question has a simple answer. Sincere fanaticism — where people genuinely believe they are saving others through coercion — is harder to address than cynical manipulation. Communities where religious, ethnic, and cultural identity are deeply intertwined present complex challenges.

What the Transition does commit to is this: these challenges will be met with firmness and compassion, not with suppression or persecution. Violence and coercion will be stopped, but through due process and with emphasis on rehabilitation rather than punishment. Communities that harm no one will not be interfered with. And strategies for addressing religious extremism will be developed through research into human psychology and social dynamics, not through ideological decree.

Since none of us is God or Goddess, we must build a society where mutual respect among all faiths — and among those of no faith — allows each of us to pursue our own process of discovery.